|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATTEMPTS
TO DESCRIBE BRAMHAN - Part 1
"Based
on the lectures by Sri Bimal Mohanty"
Our seers of the past were indeed very practical and very farsighted people
to say the least. By denying any other source as to be an alternative,
they not only fore-stalled any controversies and arguments but also maintained
for eternity the purity of the Bramhan concept in its most
unadulterated pure form. A supra-conceptual subject like Bramhan
- if allowed to - can easily lend itself to anything and everything.
The belief here is that the srutis are indeed direct utterances
by the Bramhan Himself and not created by any other agency.
Therefore none else has the knowledge to contradict it. Bhasyas
or elaborations and explanations are always welcome. But the central theme
is unquestionable and unalterable.
Because Bramhan is not a concept of mind. It is The
Truth experienced.
Satyam Satye pratisthitam
The truth is itself truth's only foundation.
Yah pasyati sah pasyati
He only sees, whoever sees it that way.
So, to know about Bramhan one has to fall back on Sruti
alone.
Each of the Srutis, or especially the Upanishads, practically
have only one central subject that they deal with. That is Bramhajnana
or the knowledge about Bramhan. From this angle and that
angle, from all possible view points, through affirmations and contradictions,
through arguments and indications, the srutis try to give
us glimpses of that all illusive concept. They are the best and the highest
intellectual property that the world possesses - the knowledge supreme.
Having said this, we should also address ourselves to another apparently
controversial observation which is often misunderstood and interpreted
in a wrong way.
Can the srutis tell us everything about Bramhan
really?
Paradoxically, the answer to this question is negative. No they can never.
How can it be otherwise? If anything can tell us everything about Bramhan,
it will be indeed contradiction in terms. It is foolish to capture Bramhan
by any images of mind and foolish still to give verbal description of
a subject which one of the upanishads -The Taittiriya itself admits :
Yato vaaco nivartante apraapya manasaa saha
From where the speech returns along with the mind without knowing it.
Bramhan is beyond definition - anirvacaniya,
beyond limits of knowledge, beyond comprehension- acintya.
Nobody knows from where to begin and nobody knows where its end is- anadi,
and ananta. It remains ever beyond the limits of our limited
faculties aparimeya, finer than the finest bigger than the
biggest - anuraniyan mahatomahiyan, and, can not be described
in totality, because no body knows what is its totalness.
It is beyond the highest stage of human comprehension and is revealed
only by himself when HE, takes you unto himself, and the knower eventually
becomes one with the knowledge itself, ceasing to exist without any kind
of separate state of existence.
Bramhaveda Bramheiva bhavati.
The knower of Bramhan becomes Bramhan Himself.
You know Bramhan only when you surrender your very existence.
So who remains to tell what Bramhan is? Who is this Bramhavit
?
So if one can never know Bramhan until he becomes Bramhan
himself, what do our Srutis do?
They simply open our eyes to stray, limited, minuscule few facets of the
unlimited array of facets of that entity to assist us to probe further
on our own.
In spite of the common perception the srutis - the vedas,
the upanishads et all- are incapable of making us realise Bramhan.
They only catalyse our Yoga leaving us and to us alone, to probe further
ahead.
But probe we must otherwise the very purpose of our existence, our goal,
our ascent is all lost. So the exercise goes on from time immemorial till
the goal is reached encompassing lives after lives, yugas
after yugas, manvantaras after manvantaras,
kalpas after kalpas . This is the unstoppable
journey of the jiva.
So when we venture to discuss about Bramhan, the objective
can not be to get an absolute view, but to go through some vital slokas
from our important srutis to get some glimpses only. That
is all there to it.
"
FOR QUESTION AND ANSWERS PLEASE SEE NEXT PAGE
"
|
|