![]() |
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| by
Sri Bimal Mohanty |
||||||||||||||||
|
QUESTION 1 FROM SRI N VISWANATHAN Pranams to Mohantyji, Your answer regarding 'Avtars" contained these lines "Depending on the need in the extreme situation, He creates that form (from His own power again) that can have consciousness, knowledge, power and potency of so incomprehensible dimension that nothing is impossible" . Rather than seeing Brahman as " He" the third person sitting somewhere and coming down when need arises, can we put in this way....... "The all pervading consciousness (Brahman) manifests itself in required form to correct imbalance and reinforce the balance in the existence". ANSWER:Actually the statements made in AHWAN and your comments are indeed in the same wavelength. You are quite correct in your thinking. The apparent confusion is perhaps due to limitations of the written words which can never interpret the complete picture as to how Brahman acts. Even the great language ‘sanskrit’ pleads this inadequacy. Take this very word ‘avatAra’. The word implies avtaran or descending. In common parlance that is what we all understand. That itself is confusing. If the Lord is all pervading, manifested in all, within and outside, where does again He descend to? And from where does he descend? His manifestation is unique and beyond verbal and written expression, the unfathomable AtmamAyA (Gita 4.6). The wise men therefore latch on to the esoteric meaning. (That is one interpretation of ‘sutras’ or ‘leads’ in our scriptures, which lead one to that esoteric concept and implore to exercise one’s intellect to discover the myriad aspects of the way of Brahman.) But the sadhaks are multidimensional entities and with different levels of consciousness. Therefore Brahman needs to be comprehensible at all levels of understanding of different people – physical, mental and psychic. This leads to various interpretations all around the same central theme. (viprah bahudha vadanti). Sri Aurobindo gave a very acceptable interpretation when he spoke of ‘being’ and ‘becoming’. Please refer again to the last paragraph of the April 2006 issue of AHWAN.
QUESTION 2 SRI ANIL KUMAR TEWARI (Re my last months's question on multiplicity of interpretations.) As a philosophy student I see a great value in your saying "each saw things that were not visible from another's viewing angle." .But, those who are "the insiders" of a particular system, would they agree with this view?..that there is something left out because of their parochial approach. .. Consciousness for the Buddhists, is momentary; for the Vedantins, it is eternal. Both seem opposite views. I would be grateful if you could enlighten me in this regard. ANSWER: Your observations are understandable. But parochial and fundamental assertions have always been there. Have they been able to halt the progress of truth? Inspite of their bickerings, truth always reveals itself. Satyam satye pratisthitam. The absolute truth (satyam, rtam) has always appealed to the higher minds of men. Truth is truth and its consciousness is universal irrespective of whichever 'ism' it is associated with. That is the strength of sanAtan philosophy. It does not claim to any copyright to truth. But being the oldest wisdom known to mankind, it is happy to open itself to all philosophies that came later, happy to see its many facets reflected in other faiths which came after it. This truth ofcourse should be appreciated not with vanity but with sublime humility. I am not quite with you, when you say 'consciousness' is deemed temporary by Buddhists and eternal by Vedantins. That is not quite so. 'Life is suffering' is Buddhism's first principle, the Buddha's first noble truth. But if there is suffering, there is a cause for suffering and there is also an end of suffering. The end of suffering comes when mind grasps the total 'consciousness' of the entire subject of suffering. So consciousness is the key. Consciousness of what? Consciousness of 'truth'. Whether that truth consciousness is equated with Brahman or is silent about Brahman is not the point. If cessation of suffering is to be permanent, consciousness has to be permanent. How is the consciousness retained and grows to its absolute state? It is sustained and nourished by knowledge (jnana as defined in the Bhagavad Gita). We give the example of a tree. As a plant grows and matures into a tree, it produces its own fruits. The fruits go on to produce more trees and then more fruits. Knowledge that sustains consciousness never dies. It is carried forward from life to life till the final liberation. QUESTION 3 FROM SRI MANI CHOWDHURY What is calmness of mind?- Does Sthita prajna of a yogic mind same as a calm mental state?
I am grateful for the knowledge and undersanding - simple and practical- that AHWAN brings every month. With every issue I clear some of my doubts. A great feeling. How does one feel when one gains for himself in spiritual awareness? ANSWER:We have an expression ‘meghamukta indu’ – a cloudfree moon. When the cloud floats away from the moon’s face, it is light all around. Do not underestimate your own contribution to your ‘great feeling’. The moon is always lit up. The passing cloud was only a scheme to reveal this truth. It is the same thing when we are struck with adversities. Every adversity comes with a message- ‘when I eventually pass away I shall leave you a little more brighter –a little more wiser.’
|
||||||||||||||||